Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Model Lead Based Paint Risk Assessor Practice Test

Which of the following is NOT a common sign of wear that a risk assessor should look for?

1. Scuff marks

2. Paint peeling

3. Unchanged color

4. Cracked surfaces

The correct answer is: Unchanged color

The choice of "unchanged color" as the correct answer highlights an important aspect of assessing lead-based paint hazards. Common signs of wear indicate potential deterioration of paint that could lead to lead exposure, particularly in buildings built before 1978 when lead-based paint was widely used. Scuff marks, paint peeling, and cracked surfaces are all visible indicators that the paint is deteriorating or failing in some way, which increases the risk of lead dust or chips being present. These signs are crucial for a risk assessor to identify, as they may symbolize areas where lead exposure could occur, prompting further testing and remediation. In contrast, an unchanged color does not signify any deterioration or failure of the paint. It may suggest that the paint is intact and functioning properly, thus not contributing to a potential lead hazard. This absence of visible wear makes "unchanged color" the logical choice as the option that does not align with the common signs of wear. Understanding these distinctions is vital for effective assessments and ensuring safety procedures in environments where lead-based paint may pose risks.